| Liverpool City Council prosecuted for data protection offences                In the first prosecution brought by the Information Commissioner for failure to 
                comply with an information notice, Liverpool City Council has today pleaded 
                guilty to the offence and agreed to the Information Commissioner’s Office 
                auditing the authority’s data protection procedures. The council was fined 
£300 and no application for costs was made. In his summing up, the District 
Judge at Liverpool Magistrates’ Court said the council had shown an 
‘appalling breakdown of communication’ and ‘a clear lack of compliance’ with 
the Data Protection Act 1998. Using the Data Protection Act a former employee of Liverpool City Council 
                made a ‘subject access request’ for personal information held on her by the 
                authority. Following the request, Liverpool City Council provided some 
                information to the woman. However she felt that some sensitive information 
                relating to her health was missing from the material provided. As a result of 
                this she made a complaint to the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).             ICO commenced an investigation and tried to contact Liverpool City Council 
                on several occasions by letter and telephone. The council did not respond. As 
                the council had failed to respond to a preliminary information notice in another 
                matter that was running alongside this case, ICO issued an information notice 
                in respect of both matters to the chief executive of Liverpool City Council byrecorded delivery on 15 June 2006. The notice required the council to 
                respond to ICO by 20 July 2006. No response of any kind was received from 
            the council.
 Under section 47 of the Data Protection Act it is a criminal offence to fail to 
                comply with an information notice. ICO wrote to the chief executive of the 
                council again on 22 August 2006 affording the public body 14 days to make 
                representations on circumstances which might make a prosecution 
                inappropriate. ICO did not receive a response and therefore was left with no 
            alternative but to commence proceedings through the courts.   Mick Gorrill, Head of the Regulatory Action Division at the Information 
                Commissioner’s Office, said: “The Data Protection Act gives us all important 
                rights, including the opportunity to find out what information is held on us by 
                an organisation. This right is the very cornerstone of the Act and that is why 
                the legislation is so important. Today’s successful prosecution serves as a 
                very useful reminder to organisations that they must comply with subject 
                access requests appropriately and that it is a criminal offence to ignore 
          information notices served by the Information Commissioner.” |