to help enterprise security across Europe
The resource centre for busy senior executives seeking the latest insights into IT Compliance & Privacy issues for major organizations
 
sarbaines oxley ofcom communications regulator
Latest Resources      data protection register
compliance resources privacy resource center

Breaking Global News
Global Compliance and Privacy News
- Breaking News, updated every 30 minutes
•   Compliance, Privacy and Security
•  Money Laundering
•  Phishing
•  Regulatory Issues
•  SOX, Basel 2, MiFID


You Tell Us:
S
S
L

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
We use SSL Technology for web data entry points:

Always
Sometimes
Never
What is SSL?

News
Are Smartphones Endangering Security? - Wick Hill
Dealing with Internet Security Threats - Ian Kilpatrick
How the New EU Rules on Data Export Affect Companies in and Outside the EU - Thomas Helbing
Farmers' Data Leak Highlights Old Technology Use - Wick Hill
Saving Money with SFTP - Wick Hill
UK Information Commissioner targets firm selling vetting data - Eversheds e80
12 Key Steps to Internet Security - Wick Hill
Telephone Monitoring Legality in the UK - Dechert
Firewall or UTM - Wick Hill
UK Information Commissioner demands mobile device encryption - Eversheds e80
Data loss - liability, reputation and mitigation of risk - Eversheds e80
Phorm, Webwise and OIX - BCS Security Forum
The challenges of PCI DSS compliance - Thales, Russell Fewing
"Quality" Data Vendor Spams us! Editor astounded!
National Gateway Security Survey 2008 - Wick Hill
Unified Threat Management - Watchguard Technologies

news archives
:
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
12 | 13
[What is this?]

Industry Blogs
Tim Berners Lee's Blog
Tim Callan's SSL Blog
Davis Wright Tremaine's Privacy & Security Law Blog
Emergent Chaos Blog
Michael Farnum's Blog
Phillip Hallam-Baker's Blog - The dotFuture Manifesto: Internet Crime, Web Services, Philosophy
Stuart King's Security and Risk Management Blog
David Lacey's IT Security Blog
Metasploit Official Blog
Jeff Pettorino's Security Convergence Blog
Jeff Richards's Demand Insights Blog
David Rowe's Risk ManagementBlog
Bruce Schneier's Security Blog
Larry Seltzer's Security Weblog
Mike Spinney's Private Communications Blog
Richard Steinnon's Threat Chaos Blog
The TechWeb Blog
Tim Trent's Marketing by Permission Blog
Rebecca Wong 's DP Thinker Blog

Newsletters
23 February Newsletter
Newsletter Archives are located in "News"

Industry Update
Internet Security Intelligence Briefing - November 2005
Find out the latest trends in e-commerce, web usage & the latest threats from adware/Spyware

Reports
Phorm, Webwise and OIX
- BCS Security Forum

'The Any Era has Arrived, and Everyione has Noticed' - Stratton Sclavos - VeriSign
Identity Security - Time to Share
Malicious code threats - iDefense
Public Alerts - updated as they happen from Stopbadware.org
Public Alerts - updated as they happen from Websense
Public Advisories - updated as they happen, from iDefense
Phoraging - Privacy invasion through the Semantic web: a special report by Mike Davies of VeriSign

Legislation
Privacy Laws & Business International E-news, Issue 57
Privacy Laws & Business UNited Kingdom E-news, Issue 60

Security Reviews
February 2007 - VeriSign Security Review
The security review archive is here

Case Studies
Finance Industry
Case Study Example

A case study on a Finance industry company.

White Papers
VeriSign® Intelligent Infrastructure for the 21st Century
VeriSign® Intelligent Infrastructure for Security
VeriSign® Intelligent Infrastructure: An Overview
Identity Protection Fraud Detection Service - description of the service
Life of a Threat - Video on Threat Management Lifecycle
Optimizing Enterprise Information Security Compliance - Dealing with all the audits
For a full list of all whitepapers, visit our Whitepaper library

Legal Notices
Privacy Policy
Terms of use

basel 2 sarbanes oxley
    legislation
data controller notification binding corporate rules BCR data transfer third countries third part data transfer basel 2 regualtor regulation regulate FSA banking network security RSA encryptin algorithm Bits sacked bank staff
Blogs compliance Reports compliancy Legislation Data Protection Case Studies data privacy White Papers data protection act News information commissioner Events security standards Links information security iDefense
Retail Solutions

What next in the RFID Debate?

compliance and privacy

Current News Updates

US Ratifies Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime

On Aug. 3, 2006, the United States Senate ratified the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, a multinational treaty that attempts to foster cooperation on prosecuting Internet-based crimes. Although some privacy organizations are protesting the treaty, overall, the response to America 's ratification of the treaty, especially commentary from leading American security companies, has been quite positive.

To-date, 38 counties have signed the treaty that requires that member countries establish as criminal offenses a wide variety of cyber-related activity, including "the access to the whole or any part of a computer system without right…when committed intentionally, the interception without right, made by technical means, of non-public transmissions of computer data to, from or within a computer system…the damaging, deletion, deterioration, alteration or suppression of computer data without right" (ibid.)., child pornography and other offenses. It also requires that signatory countries establish procedures for dealing with these crimes and provides a prosecutorial framework for international cooperation between signatory countries.

The real impact of ratifying the treaty for the US will be the resultant cooperation with other countries, which will help authorities to track and prosecute cyber crimes originating from countries that target the US .

Computer security companies are practically unanimous in praising the Senate's ratification of the treaty. For example, the Cyber Security Industry Alliance, a computer-security advocacy group, released a statement in which Executive Director Paul Kurtz said, "Today marks an important milestone in the fight against international cybercrime. Through its support of the cybercrime treaty, the US is strengthening international laws and empowering law enforcement authorities to protect our information-based systems" (see

However, the Senate's ratification of the treaty has also drawn criticism, primarily from privacy groups. For example, the Electronic Frontier Foundation's (EFF) statement on the ratification calls that treaty the "World's Worst Internet Law" and claims that "the treaty requires that the US government help enforce other countries' 'cybercrime' laws, even if the act being prosecuted is not illegal in the United States.” This reportedly means, in EFF's view, that “countries with laws limiting free speech on the Net could oblige the FBI to uncover the identities of anonymous American critics or monitor their communications on behalf of foreign governments." The EFF also claims that "American ISPs would be obliged to obey other jurisdictions' requests to log their users' behavior without due process or compensation" (see "Critics Clash Over Cybercrime Convention," Infoworld , Aug. 7, 2006 ,

Complaints about the treaty by privacy groups seem overblown, though. The EFF's view that the treaty requires the US to assist in the prosecution of cyber crimes that are not illegal in this country is irrelevant, since other signatories to the treaty have criminalized few, if any, activities that the US has not deemed to be illegal (if countries with tighter restrictions on Internet usage, such as China, join the treaty, this could become much more problematic). US officials have taken freedom-of-speech concerns into account and say that the treaty will not override constitutional protections. For example, the US opted out of the "hate speech" component of the treaty since many European countries have much tougher restrictions on freedom of speech than the US .

For corporations whose activities are possibly impacted by the treaty, the effects will most likely be minimal, since the bulk of activities stipulated by the treaty are best practices anyway. Thus, if adhered to by the signatory companies, the treaty provides significant benefits and no major additional burdens.

Discuss this article

 


This site is independent of all its sources
The contents of the site are sourced from across the industry. All copyrights are acknowledged.